I WILL GIVE 12 POINTS Moses purchased running shoes for $23.41. Grant purchased running shoes for $23.31. Write a paragraph explaining how you know who spent more. Make sure to include the two different ways you could write an inequality statement.

grant got a better deal on the shoes because he paid 63 cents less. And whoever sold Moses the shoes most likely sold the same shoes to grant but for a lower price for whatever reason. Maybe they don't like Moses. But the only way to now is if the shoes are the same but shoe size they probably were different sized shoes.

So after the two shoes have been compared you will have your answer. If they are the same then we're the people who sold the shoes to the same person. if so they have to ask the person who sold the shoes why? And if they don't have an answer Moses should report them to the manager or get a refund on the shoes. And if that doesn't work Moses should start shopping for shoes at a new store.

But Moses should try to convince Gant to help him investagate this problem. And if they can find something they can put together a whole case and give it to the police. And wait for the police's ideas or approcah for this case. And try to put the whole case to rest like it never happened after they are done. And just try to get 63 cents back.

Two ways:

Step-by-step explanation:

One: Moses got ripped off.

Two: Grant is a lucky duck.

step-by-step explanation:

most likely the answer is a.

alice wins if a total of 5 is rolled. finn wins if a total of 9 is rolled.

$4034.40

the perimeter of the field is the sum of the lengths of the four sides:

47 yd + 158 yd + 47 yd + 158 yd = 410 yd

the cost of 3 ft (1 yd) of fence is 3×$3.28 = $9.84.

so the cost of jake's wood perimeter fance is

(410 yd) × ($9.84 /yd) = $4034.40