subject
Mathematics, 26.10.2020 05:00 gizmo50245

LaVonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70 by 0.4 to get 28. Is her estimate reasonable? No, because she should have rounded 38% down to 30%.
No, because she should have rounded 63 down to 60.
Yes, because she correctly rounded 38% up to 40%.
Yes, because she correctly rounded 63 up to 70.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:00
Use the diagonals to determine whether a parallelogram with vertices u(2,−2), v(9,−2), w(9,−6), and x(2,−6) is a rectangle, rhombus, or square. give all the names that apply.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
What describes horizontal cross section of the right rectangle 6m 8m 5m
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
If you are trying to move an attached term across the equal sign (=), what operation would you use to move it?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
The following division is being performed using multiplication by the reciprocal find the missing numbers is 5/12 divided by x/3 equals 5/12 times x/10 equals 1/x
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
LaVonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70...
Questions
question
Biology, 01.02.2020 11:45
question
Mathematics, 01.02.2020 11:45