subject
Mathematics, 26.10.2020 05:00 jstoners

LaVonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70 by 0.4 to get 28. Is her estimate reasonable? No, because she should have rounded 38% down to 30%.
No, because she should have rounded 63 down to 60.
Yes, because she correctly rounded 38% up to 40%.
Yes, because she correctly rounded 63 up to 70.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Can i get some on 18,20,& 22? or one of them
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Bugs bunny was 33 meters below ground, digging his way toward pismo beach, when he realized he wanted to be above ground. he turned and dug through the dirt diagonally for 80 meters until he was above ground
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
Determine the difference: 3.2 × 1010 – 1.1 × 1010. write your answer in scientific notation.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
The lengths of all sides of a triangle are integers when measured in decimeters. one of the sides has length of 1 dm and another of 3 dm. find the perimeter of the triangle.'
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
LaVonne estimated 38% of 63 by rounding 38% up to 40%, rounding 63 up to 70, and then multiplying 70...
Questions