Janet is designing a frame for a client. She wants to prove to her client that m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE in her sketch. What is the missing justification in the proof? Segment AB is parallel to segment CD, and transversal EF intersects segment AB at G and segment CD at H. Statement Justification segment AB is parallel to segment CD with transversal segment EF Given m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB Vertical Angles Theorem m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE Alternate Interior Angles Theorem m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE

the quotient is 4x^2 - 27x + 167 with a remainder of -996

step-by-step explanation:

in synthetic division, use -6 as the divisor and use the coefficients {4, -3, 5, 6}:

-6     )   4     -3     5     6

                -24   162 -1002

          4   -27   167   -996

thus, the quotient is 4x^2 - 27x + 167 with a remainder of -996.

note:   your "4x°-3x+5x+6" is ambiguous / incomplete.   i had to assume that you meant '4x^3 - 3x^2 + 5x + 6."

i dont know sorry

step-by-step explanation:

it is x=-4

step-by-step explanation: