Suppose the first two terms of a pattern are 1, 2. Sarah says that each term is multiplied by two to get the next term. Jacob agrees. Can you find a counterexample to prove them false

21

jk it's 20

step-by-step explanation:

for this case we have by definition, if two lines are perpendicular, then the product of their slopes is -1.

then, given the following line:

so,

we are looking for m_ {2}:

then, the line is given by:

we find "b" replacing the given point:

finally, the equation is:

option c

answer: 3.26019516

step-by-step explanation: