Why isnt 16:14 equivlant to 64:60

The scalar used does not exist in the real number system.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio 16:14 is not equivalent to the ratio 64:60 because the scalar used does not exist in the real number system.

Note, that the ratio 64:60 can be scaled down by 4 to be the ratio 16:15, which is not the ratio 16:14.

In order to scale 64:60 to 16:14 or vise versa, you'd have to use a number that simply does not exist in the real number system.

Cheers.

well we know there are 4 clubs in 52 cards so it’s replaced so it should be 3/51

step-by-step explanation:

sounds & other waves originate from any vibrating object