Vladas believes that an equation with a squared term is never a function of x. Which equation can be used to show Vladas that his hypothesis is incorrect?

the size of the resulting matrix is 1-by-3.

step-by-step explanation:

the size of the two matrices given are as follows:

no .of rows of matrix 1 = 1

no .of columns of matrix 1 = 3

no .of rows of matrix 1 = 3

no .of columns of matrix 1 = 3

to find the size of the resulting matrix without actually solving the multiplication of the matrix, this is what you do:

if resulting matrix = matrix 1 * matrix 2

no. of rows of the resulting matrix = number of rows of matrix 1

no. of columns of resulting matrix = number of columns of matrix 2

note: the order of the matrices matter!

from the figure we get,

the x axis shows   the months and,

the y-axis shows the number of satisfied customer.

each line or each cell in upward direction (y-axis) shows 500.

the appropriate scale for the y - axis is: -

a = 2000 customers

b = 4000 customers

c = 6000 customers

d = 8000 customers

e = 10000 customers

f = 12000 customers

g = 14000 customers

step-by-step explanation:

use pothagarean therom

a^2+b^2=c^2 so first ac

acm is a right triangle because c= 90°

and am (the hypotenuse or c) =16+9 =25

but there is not enough info we need another angle or side length

sadsadsadsad

step-by-step explanation: