NEED HELP ASAP. Given: ∠P ≅ ∠Q and bisects ∠PQR.
Prove:

Supply the missing reason in Statement 1 of the proof of the the Converse of the Isosceles Triangle Theorem.

Begin with isosceles ∆PRQ with ∠P ≅ ∠Q. Construct , a bisector of ∠PRQ.

41/17 as a decimal rounded to the nearest hundredth

Manuela claims that and are congruent. which statement best describes her claim? she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same orientation. she is incorrect because the segments do not have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same length. she is correct because the segments have the same orientation.

How does the graph of y = 3x compare to the graph of y = 3-x?