Tasha assembled a picture frame that is advertised as rectangular. The completed frame is 14 inches long and 10 inches wide. She measured the diagonal length across the frame as 20 inches. Which best explains why the frame cannot actually be rectangular? 14 squared + 10 squared not-equals 20 squared 14 + 10 not-equals 20 (14 + 10) squared not-equals 20 squared (14 squared + 10 squared) squared not-equals 20 squared

step-by-step explanation:

there is a formula i can give you:

it is r^2*n*sin(360/n) divided by 2 where r represents the "radius" and n is the number of sides.

plug them in:

(10sqrt(3))^2*6*sin(360/6) divided by 2

100*3*6*sin(60) divided by 2

900*sin(60)

900*sqrt(3)/2

450*sqrt(3)

approx is 779.4 cm^2

step-by-step explanation:

6.48/4 4 goes into 6.48 1.62 times

the graph in the attached figure

step-by-step explanation:

we have

using a graphing tool

the graph in the attached figure

the roots are ( x-intercepts) x=-0.5,x=1,x=3

the y-intercept is the point (0,3)

asadsadsad

step-by-step explanation: