To prove quadrilateral WXYZ is a parallelogram, Travis begins by proving △WZY ≅ △YXW by using the SAS congruency theorem. Which reasons can Travis use to prove the two triangles are congruent? Check all that apply.

∠ZWY ≅ ∠XYW by the alternate interior ∠s theorem,

WY ≅ WY by the reflexive property

WZ ≅ XY by the given.

Step-by-step explanation:

The option:

can't be used because we want to prove that WXYZ is a parallelogram

The Alternate Interior Angles Theorem states that, when two parallel lines (here XY and WZ) are cut by a transversal (here WY), the resulting alternate interior angles (here ∠ZWY and ∠XYW ) are congruent.

The reflexive property of congruence states that an angle, line segment, or shape is always congruent to itself. Here,  WY ≅ WY.

may i see the picture? it would a lot, xox

answer: a. 13/44

step-by-step explanation: judging by the information given to us, we are looking for experimental probability. we can see that 13 males have chosen chocolate ice cream. there are 44 ice creams in total (remember that the total is always the denominator). so our answer is 13/44.