How can her partial solution be interpreted? The equation has one solution: x = 0. The equation has one solution: x = 8. The equation has no solution. The equation has infinite solutions.

The equation has no solution

Step-by-step explanation:

The following information is missing:

Lily begins solving the equation 4(x – 1) – x = 3(x + 5) – 11.

Her work is shown below.

4(x – 1) – x = 3(x + 5) – 11

4x – 4 – x = 3x + 15 – 11

3x – 4 = 3x + 4

This means that the equation has no solution, because if we simplify her last term, we get:

-4 = 4

wich has no sense. In other words, there is no x value which satisfy:

3x – 4 = 3x + 4

g = (2, 2)

step-by-step explanation:

given the ratio is 1 : 1 then f is the midpoint of eg

let the coordinates of g = (x, y)

using the midpoint formula

(0 + x) = 1 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

0 + x = 2 ⇒ x = 2

similarly

(4 + y) = 3 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

4 + y = 6 ( subtract 4 from both sides )

y = 2

coordinates of g = (2, 2)

da freeck kinda math is this just drop out

step-by-step explanation: