A study of the effect of seatbelt use in head-on car collisions found that drivers using a seatbelt had a 64.1% survival rate, while drivers not using a seatbelt had a 41.5% survival rate. If seatbelts have no effect on survival rate, there is less that a 0.0001 chance of getting these results. The probability shows that the sample results (could or could not) have occurred by chance. It appears that there (is or is not) sufficient evidence to conclude that seatbelts do have an effect on survival rate.

The correct option are;

1) Could not

2) Is

Step-by-step explanation:

The parameters given are;

The survival rate of drivers using seat-belt = 67%

The survival rate of drivers not using seat-belt = 41.5%

The chance of getting the survival rate results without a correlation with the use of seat-belt < 0.0001

Given that the chance of obtaining the given survival rates without the seat-belt having an effect on survival rate is less than 0.01 percent we have;

The probability shows that the sample results could not have occurred by chance. It appears that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that seat-belts do have an effect on survival rate.

there would be 365 different 4 digit numbers

step-by-step explanation:

i belive that it is 365 because i asked google

the answer is d. (1.2, -4.7) on edgn

hope this !