1.How did Jim conclude that the process was not capable based on his first set of samples? (Hint: Estimate the process standard deviation, σ, using )2.Does the second set of samples show anything that the first set didn't? Explain what and why.3.Assuming the problem can be found and corrected, what impact do you think this would have on the capability of the process? Compute the potential process capability using the second data set.4.If small samples can reveal something that large samples might not, why not just take small samples in every situation?

Asays "we are both knaves" and b says nothing. exercises 24–31 relate to inhabitants of an island on which there are three kinds of people: knights who always tell the truth, knaves who always lie, and spies (called normals by smullyan [sm78]) who can either lie or tell the truth. you encounter three people, a, b, and c. you know one of these people is a knight, one is a knave, and one is a spy. each of the three people knows the type of person each of other two is. for each of these situations, if possible, determine whether there is a unique solution and determine who the knave, knight, and spy are. when there is no unique solution, list all possible solutions or state that there are no solutions. 24. a says "c is the knave," b says, "a is the knight," and c says "i am the spy."

Acar travels at an average speed of 52 miles per hour. how long does it take to travel 299 miles

Compound inequalities. , i’m being timed