The solution to an inequality is given in set-builder notation as {x l x > two-thirds}. What is another way to represent this solution set? (–∞ , two-thirds]
(–∞ , two-thirds)
(two-thirds, ∞)
[two-thirds, ∞)

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality