Given: Z1 is complementary to 22. What is the missing statement in step 3 of the proof?
22 is complementary to 23.
0 m21 = m22
Prove: mz1 = m 23
OmZ1 + m22 = 90°
OmZ2 = m23
VV
m22 + m23 = 180°
Statements
1. 21 is comp. to 22
2. 22 is comp. to 23
3. ?
4. m21-90°-m22
5 m22+m23-90°
6. m23-90°-m22
7. m 1 m3
1
2.
3
4
5
6.
7
Reasons
given
given
def. of comp. ZS
subtr. equality prop.
def. of comp. ZS
subtr. equality prop
trans. prop.

Option (2)

Step-by-step explanation:

                          Statements                                Reasons

1). ∠1 is comp. to ∠2                                1. Given

2). ∠2 is comp. to ∠3                              2. Given

3). ∠1 + ∠2 = 90°                                      3. def. of comp. angles

4). m∠1 = 90° - ∠1                                    4. Subtr. equality property

5). m∠2 + m∠3 = 90°                              5. def. of comp. angles

6). m∠3 = 90° - m∠2                               6. subtr. equality property

7). m∠1 = m∠3                                         7. Transitive property

Option (2) will be the answer.

false

step-by-step explanation:

rulers and compasses arent required in order to bisect an angle because when bisecting angles, you're making a "half circle" and considering in order to bisect an angle it wouldn't be straight, you wouldn't need either of the two

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this