Lim x → 3 − f ( x ) = 6 and lim x → 3 + f ( x ) = 5 . As x approaches 3 , f ( x ) approaches 5 , but f ( 3 ) = 6 . As x approaches 3 from the right, f ( x ) approaches 6 . As x approaches 3 from the left, f ( x ) approaches 5 . As x approaches 3 , f ( x ) approaches 6 , but f ( 3 ) = 5 . As x approaches 3 from the left, f ( x ) approaches 6 . As x approaches 3 from the right, f ( x ) approaches 5 . In this situation is it possible that lim x → 3 f ( x ) exists? Explain.

Step-by-step explanation:

In limits and continuity of a function, for a function to be continuous, the left hand limit of the function must be equal to the left hand limit and they must be equal to the limit of the function at that point. Mathematically;

All continuous functions are known to exist but discontinuous functions doesn't exist.

From the question, the point we are considering is at n =3

Given

but f(3)= 6

As we can see, the left hand limit of the function isn't equal to the left hand limit, this shows that the limit of the function isn't continuous and since all discontinuous function does not exists then  lim x → 3 f ( x ) does not exist.

d 600 because 15*10*2=300

300+300=600

step-by-step explanation: