The Lopez family is saving $275 monthly for Verona’s college education. The family anticipates they will need to contribute $10,000 toward her first year of college, which is in 3 years. Which best explains whether or not the family can expect to have enough money after saving for 3 years? The family will not have enough money. They will have saved only $8,250. The family will not have enough money. They will have saved only $9,900. The family will likely have enough money. They will have saved $8,250 and have accumulated interest. The family will likely have enough money. They will have saved $9,900 and have accumulated interest.

The family will likely have enough money. They will have saved $9,900 and have accumulated interest.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps, Good Luck!!! :)

The family will likely have enough money. They will have saved $9,900 and have accumulated interest.

(didnt see that u had already put the answer.dont know why u posted it if u already knew.not being rude,just saying.)

Step-by-step explanation:

g = (2, 2)

step-by-step explanation:

given the ratio is 1 : 1 then f is the midpoint of eg

let the coordinates of g = (x, y)

using the midpoint formula

(0 + x) = 1 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

0 + x = 2 ⇒ x = 2

similarly

(4 + y) = 3 ( multiply both sides by 2 )

4 + y = 6 ( subtract 4 from both sides )

y = 2

coordinates of g = (2, 2)

whole numbers.

step-by-step explanation:

we are given the average monthly rainfall (in millimeters) model r(m) for the years 1900-2009 as a function of the month number m.

as we can see m is taken for the number of months for years 1900-2009.

we know that number of months can't be a negative number or decimal number or a fraction.

so, the number of months could be only positive whole numbers.

therefore, whole numbers is more appropriate for the domain of r.