An educational technology company advertises English language fluency after one year of using their online language courses. Researchers test their curriculum by randomly selecting 100 new students and following their project after one year of using the curriculum. They test the students using Cambridge English Test and assign each student a score between 1 to 25. They consider scores below 15 to indicate a lack of fluency: H0:μ=15 HA:μ≥15 Based on the data they conclude that the evidence is not strong enough to conclude that the students are fluent in English. What type of error is possible in this situation? Type I Type II

In this case, as the null hypothesis is not rejected, the only error possible is Type II error. That means that the researchers conclude that the students are not fluent when they really are fluent in English.

Step-by-step explanation:

They test an hypothesis to test the claim that students are strong in english.

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

If they reject the null hypothesis, that means that the studens are fluent in English.

With the data they have, they conclude that the evidence is not strong enough to conclude that the students are fluent in English.

That means they failed to reject the null hypothesis.

The type of errors are:

Type I error: reject a true null hypothesis.

Type II error: failed to reject a false null hypothesis.

In this case, as the null hypothesis is not rejected, the only error possible is Type II error. That means that the researchers conclude that the students are not fluent when they really are fluent in English.

the radius is 2 times the diameter.

step-by-step explanation:

168

step-by-step explanation:

first off, we know that he drove 3.5 hours at a rate of 48 mph.

knowing that, we want to see how many miles he drove all-together.

in this case, we can just multiply 48 by 3.5.

48 * 3.5 = 168