The vertices of ΔGHI are G (2, 4), H (4, 8), and I (8, 4). The vertices of ΔJKL are J (1, 1), K (2, 3), and L (4, 1). Which conclusion is true about the triangles?

They are congruent by the definition of congruence in terms of rigid motions.
They are similar by the definition of similarity in terms of a dilation.
The ratio of their corresponding sides is 1:3
The ratio of their corresponding angles is 1:3.

They are similar by the definition of similarity in terms of a dilation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step is finding the sides of each triangle.

In triangle GHI, we have that:

GH = sqrt((4-2)^2 + (8-4)^2) = 4.4721

HI = sqrt((8-4)^2 + (4-8)^2) = 5.6569

IG = sqrt((2-8)^2 + (4-4)^2) = 6

Now, for the triangle JKL, we have:

JK = sqrt((2-1)^2 + (3-1)^2) = 2.2361

KL = sqrt((4-2)^2 + (1-3)^2) = 2.8284

LJ = sqrt((1-4)^2 + (1-1)^2) = 3

The triangles are not congruent, because the sides are different

They are similar, because their sides have a proportion (sides of GHI are 2 times the sides of JKL). If they are similar, they have the same angles.

The ratio of their corresponding sides is 1:2, not 1:3

The ratio of their corresponding angles is 1:1, not 1:3

given : the shape of his satellite can be modeled by   where x and y are modeled in inches.

now,the given equation   is a equation of parabola.

here, coefficient of x is positive, hence the parabola opens rightwards.

on comparing this equation with standard equation , we get

in standard equation, coordinates of focus=(0,m)

thus for given equation coordinates of focus=(0,1.5)

step-by-step explanation: