subject
Mathematics, 26.04.2020 05:18 anher

Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods were found in the defendant's possession.
Premise 3: Two witnesses have identified the defendant as the thief.
Conclusion: The defendant is guilty of theft.
Decide whether the above argument is inductive or deductive.
tive.
Select an answer
If the above argument is inductive, decide if it is strong or weak. Select not applicable if the
argument is deductive.
Select an answer

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 12:30
If f(x) = 3-2x and g(x) =1/x+5 to what is the value (f/g)(8)
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Tabby sells clothing at a retail store, and she earns a commission of 6.25% on all items she sells. last week she sold a pair of jeans for $32.50, a skirt for $18.95, and 2 blouses for $14.95 each. what was tabby's total commission? a $4.15 b $5.08 c $81.35 d $348.60
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
The description below represents function a and the table represents function b: function a the function is 5 more than 3 times x. function b x y −1 2 0 5 1 8 which statement is correct about the slope and y-intercept of the two functions? (1 point) their slopes are equal but y-intercepts are not equal. their slopes are not equal but y-intercepts are equal. both slopes and y intercepts are equal. neither slopes nor y-intercepts are equal.
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30
What is the point of inflection for the function f(x)=2cos4x on the interval (0, pi/2)
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Premise 1: The defendant has no alibi for the night of the theft.
Premise 2: The stolen goods...
Questions
question
History, 08.12.2020 19:20
question
Arts, 08.12.2020 19:20