Find a counterexample to show that the statement is false. Assume all sets are subsets of a universal set U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}. (Enter your answers for A, B, and C in roster notation as a comma-separated list of sets. Enter EMPTY or ∅ for the empty set.) For all sets A, B, and C,

AU (B-C) = (AUB) - (AUC).
A, B, C = .

A = {1}

B = {2}

C = empty set

Step-by-step explanation:

REcall that given sets A, B then A-B = , recall also that the complement of the empty set is the universe set U.

Then,

Also, recall that given a set A, the union of A with the empty set is again the set A. Then

But,

answer: 1,380

step-by-step explanation:

1: you turn %15 into a decimal by moving the decimal point two places to the left.

2: and then you multiply .15 by 1,200 , which will get you 180.00

3: from there you will add 180 to 1,200

4: which will get you 1,380

hope it *im kind of slow so idk if my answer is right*

c

step-by-step explanation:

it would be see because your formula is f(x)=6x, so 6 times 1 is 6 and you go on and the best answer is c.