Question 2 (2 points)
Find the area of the parallelogram and the length of DF to the nearest tenth, with EA =12, AB=9, and CB=10
12

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which statement most accurately describe why the division property of exponents does not apply to the expression (-8)^2/(-3)^4

The border line of the linear inequality 4x + 7y < 5 is dotted true or false?