Help I’m failing
What is the inverse of the following statement?If a triangle has three congruent angles, then it is an equiangular triangle.

If a triangle does not have three congruent angles, then it is not an equiangular triangle.

If a triangle is equiangular, then it has three congruent angles.

If a triangle has three congruent angles, then it is an equiangular triangle.

If a triangle is not equiangular, then it does not have three congruent angles.

We never did inverse propositions when I had logic.  The inverse of

if P then Q

is the proposition

if not P then not Q

We have

P: A triangle has three congruent angles

Q: it is an equilangular triangle

The inverse is thus   if not P then not Q

If a triangle does not have three congruent angles then it is not an equilangular triangle.

 First choice

The reason we didn't do inverses is it has the same truth value as the converse; the inverse is the contrapositive of the converse.

this shows a reflection over the x-axis and is translated one unit down and 6 units to the right (x + 6, y - 1)

hope this !

~just a girl in love with shawn mendes

24

step-by-step explanation:

the graph shows 30% of students walk. 80 students were questioned, so the number that said they walk is

30% × 80 = 0.30 × 80 = 24