Erin writes the set of ordered pairs below. The set represents a function.

{(3, – 3), (5, 0), (– 1, 4), (– 6, 7)}

Erin claims that she can add any point to the set and have the set still represent a function.

Which of the following points can be used to show that Erin's claim is incorrect? Select three that apply.
A.(–6, 1)
B.(–1, 9)
C.(0, 5)
D.(1, 7)
E.(3, –2

option a, c,d are correct.

step-by-step explanation:

from the given figure, it is given that z is equidistant from the sides of the triangle rst, then from triangle tzb and triangle szb, we have

tz=sz(given)

bz=zb(common)

therefore, by rhs rule,δtzb ≅δszb

by cpctc, sz≅tz

also, from δctz and δasz,

tz=sz(given)

∠tcz=∠saz(90°)

by rhs rule, δctz ≅ δasz, therefore by cpctc, ∠ctz≅∠asz

also,from δasz and δzsb,

zs=sz(common)

∠zbs=∠saz=90°

by rhs rule, δasz ≅δzsb, therefore, by cpctc, ∠asz≅∠zsb

hence, option a, c,d are correct.

on a coordinate grid, point a is at (−4.0, −2.4) and point b is at (4.0, −2.4). point b is a reflection of point a across the –axis. input either a lowercase x or i think is the right awnser

step-by-step explanation: