Suppose that we try to solve the matrix equation AX = B by using an inverse matrix, but find that even though the matrix A is a square matrix, it has no inverse. What can be said about the outcome from solving the associated system of linear equations by the Gauss-Jordan method?

  The system will be found to be inconsistent or dependent.

Step-by-step explanation:

The matrix A will have no inverse for two different reasons:

In the latter case, the Gauss-Jordan method will find a set of parametric equations for a solution. In the former case, there is no solution.

The outcome will depend on the reason why there is no inverse.

square pyramid

step-by-step explanation:

square prism looks like nothing like that

triangular prism has a rectangular base instead of a square base

tetrahedron has a triangular base