Determine whether the statement is true or false, and explain why.
integration by parts should be used to evaluate ∫^1_0 x^2/x^3+1 dx.

False

Step-by-step explanation:

In this case, i woudnt reccomend to use integration by parts, becuase you are not simplifying the expression by doing an integration and a derivation. It is not easy to integrate 1/x³+1, and if you derivate it, then a natural logarithm would appear, and the integral wont be easier after this parts step.

It is a better idea to use integration by substitution. Note that if you replace x³+1 by a variable y, we have that dy = 3x² dx. We can easily make a 3xdx appear in the integral by multiplying and dividing by 3, solving the integral easily:

(Note that, if x ranges from 0 to 1, then u = x³+1 ranges from 0³+1 = 1 to 1³+1 = 2)

let soccer = x and golf = y

part a

1st equation: x + y = 125

2nd equation: x = y +45

part b

replace x in the 1st equation with the 2nd one:

y + 45 + y = 125

simplify:

2y + 45 = 125

subtract 45 from each side:

2y = 80

divide both sides by 2:

y = 80/2

y = 40

she plays golf for 40 minutes.

part c

no because she plays soccer for 45 minutes longer than golf 40 +45 =   85 minutes, not 80 minutes.

explanation:

infrared radiation has wavelength in the range between 700 nm and 1 mm. lets' convert these values into scientific notation, keeping in mind that:

let's start from the lower value, we have:

(we moved the dot two places to the left, so we increased the exponent by 2 units, from -9 to -7)

the higher value is:

so, the range of wavelength of infrared radiation is: