Enter your answer and show all the steps that you use to solve this problem in the space provided.

eliza and jamie are making cupcakes for a bake sale at school. eliza needs 213
c of flour for her recipe and jamie needs 134 c for her recipe. they have 4 c of flour. do they have enough flour for both recipes? explain.

Question is not proper; Proper question is given below;

Eliza and Jamie are making cupcakes for a bake sale at school.Eliza needs 2 1/3 cups of flour for her recipe, and Jamie needs 1 3/4 cups for her recipe. they have 4 cups of flour.Do they have enough flour for both of their recipes? explain.

They do not have enough flour for both recipes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Amount of flour Eliza needs = cup

can be rewritten as

Amount of flour Eliza needs = cup

Amount of flour Jamie needs = cup

can be rewritten as

Amount of flour Eliza needs = cup

Total Amount of flour they have = 4 cups

We need to find whether  they have enough flour for both recipes.

Total Amount of flour they need is equal to sum of Amount of flour Eliza needs and Amount of flour Jamie needs.

framing in equation form we get;

Total Amount of flour they need =

Now taking LCM for making the denominator common we get;

Total Amount of flour they need =

Now Since the Total amount of flour they need is which greater than Total Amount of flour they have which is 4 cups.

Hence we can say that they do not have enough flour for both recipes.

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)

is there a question here?

step-by-step explanation: