Whether a grant proposal is funded quite often depends on the reviewers. suppose a
group of research proposals was evaluated by a group of experts as to whether the
proposals were worthy of funding. when these same proposals were submitted to a
second independent group or experts, the decision to fund was reversed in 30% of the
cases. if the probability that a proposal is judged worthy of funding by the first peer
review group is .2, what are the probabilities of these events? (4 points. 1-1/3 point for
each part of the question.)
a. worthy proposal is approved by both groups
b. worthy proposal disapproved by both groups
c. worthy proposal is approved by one group

d? maybe

step-by-step explanation:

an advantage of the standard deviation is that it increases as the dispersion of the data increases. e. the interquartile range is preferred when the data are not skewed or no have outliers. an advantage of the standard deviation is that it uses all the observations in its computation.

step-by-step explanation:

the original amount doesn't ''re just looking for the time it takes for 1/2 of the substance to we have

(1/2) =)     take the ln   of both sides

ln (1/2)   = )   and we can write

ln(1/2) = ) lne     and lne   = 1     so we have

ln(1/2) = -.1092t     divide both sides by -.1092

t = ln(1/2)/-.1092 = about 6.347 days = about 6.3 days (rounded)

the answer is; biodiversity resulting from few ancestors

adaptive radiation occurs when a population is subjected to a large natural environment with spatial ecological variations. the parts of the population in the different ecologies begin to adapt to their local environments. due to non-random mating across the large populations, this causes the different populations from the large population to speciate within their local environments. they, therefore, diverge to different species sharing a common ancestor.