Willis analyzed the following table to determine if the function it represents is linear or non-linear. first he found the differences
in the y-values as 7 - 1 = 6, 17 - 7 = 10, and 31 - 17 = 14. then he concluded that since the differences of 6, 10, and 14 are
increasing by 4 each time, the function has a constant rate of change and is linear. what was willis's mistake?

a

step-by-step explanation:

rurbrbrjrnrbjr

168

step-by-step explanation:

first off, we know that he drove 3.5 hours at a rate of 48 mph.

knowing that, we want to see how many miles he drove all-together.

in this case, we can just multiply 48 by 3.5.

48 * 3.5 = 168

answer: the angel abc is 30°,and the abc is a triangle where the angel bac is 90°

so ac is the half of 24=12ft,and from the pythagorean theorem we find ba

ba=√bc^2-ac^2=√576-144=√432=12√3ft

so bac is 12+12√3=12(1+√3)ft