The graph below models the value of a $20,000 car tyears after it was purchased.
value of car
dollars
2
18000
16000
14000
12000 +
1+
8000 +
6000+
4000 +
2000+
+
2
4
6
8 10 12 14 16 18
years
which statement best describes why the value of the car is a function of the number of years since it was nurgh

a framing bias

step-by-step explanation:

rodrigo is subject to a framing bias i believe.

x² + 11x + 18 < 0  

[-11 ± sqrt(121 - 72)]/2 = (-11 ± 7)/2  

solution: (-9, -2)

step-by-step explanation:

0.0076, if you meant 4.125 divided by 0.03125 it would be 132

step-by-step explanation:

first you have to move the decimal in 0.03125 over until its behind the 5 which is 5 places over. now the number is 3125

then you have to move the decimal in 4.125, 5 places over. now the number is 4,112,500.

now you divide like you would normally would and get 0.0076