subject
Mathematics, 02.12.2019 01:31 Boogates7427

Abotanist found a correlation between the length of an aspen leaf and its surface area to be 0.94. why does the correlation value of 0.94 not necessarily indicate that a linear model is the most appropriate model for the relationship between length of an aspen leaf and its surface area?

a) the value must be exactly 1 or -1 to indicate a linear model is the most appropriate model.

b) the value must be 0 to indicate a linear model is the most appropriate model.

c) a causal relationship should be established first before determining the most appropriate model.

d) the value of 0.94 implies that only 88% of the data have a linear relationship.

e) even with a correlation value of 0.94, it is possible that the relationship could still be better represented by a nonlinear model.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
What is not true about kl and mn? what is mn? (show )
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
Given ab and cb are tangents of p, and m =10°. what is the measure of abp?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:20
If the value of cos330°is√3/2 then find cos 165°.
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Type the correct answer in the box. consider the system of linear equations below. rewrite one of the two equations above in the form ax + by = c, where a, b, and c are constants, so that the sum of the new equation and the unchanged equation from the original system results in an equation in one variable.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Abotanist found a correlation between the length of an aspen leaf and its surface area to be 0.94. w...
Questions
question
English, 23.03.2021 23:40
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 23:40
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 23:40
question
English, 23.03.2021 23:40
question
Biology, 23.03.2021 23:40
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 23:40