Mathematics, 21.11.2019 06:31 mahaypatto

Experian would like to test the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in north carolina. a random sample of 40 adults in virginia had an average credit score of 699 and a random sample of 35 adults in north carolina had an average credit score of 682. it is believed that the population standard deviation for credit scores is 44 and 41 for virginia and north carolina residents, respectively. experian would like to set α = 0.05. define population 1 as virginia and population 2 as north carolina anda. use the critical value approach to test this hypothesis. b. construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in population mean and interpret the results.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

a. We fail to reject the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina at the significance level of 0.05.

b. The 95% confidence interval for the true difference of means is -2.2468 and 36.2468. There is a probability of 95% that the true difference of means $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is between -2.2468 and 36.2468. This confidence interval contains the number 0, this is consistent with the results we got in a. Because we fail to reject the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina at the significance level of 0.05.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ be the true difference between the average credit score for an adult in Virginia and the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina. We have the large sample sizes $n_{1} = 40$ and $n_{2} = 35$ , the unbiased point estimate for $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is $\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}$ , i.e., 699-682 = 17.

The standard error is given by $\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^{2}_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}_{2}}{n_{2}}}$ , i.e.,

$\sqrt{\frac{(44)^{2}}{40}+\frac{(41)^{2}}{35}}$ = 9.8198.

a. We want to test $H_{0}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} = 0$ vs $H_{1}: \mu_{1}-\mu_{2} \neq 0$ (two-tailed alternative). The rejection region is given by RR = {z | z < -1.96 or z > 1.96} where -1.96 and 1.96 are the 2.5th and 97.5th quantiles of the standard normal distribution respectively. The test statistic is $Z = \frac{\bar{x}_{1} - \bar{x}_{2}-0}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^{2}_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^{2}_{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ and the observed value is $z_{0} = \frac{17}{9.8198} = 1.7312$ . Because 1.7312 does not fall inside RR, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

b. The endpoints for a 95% confidence interval for $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is given by $17\pm (z_{0.05/2})9.8198$ , i.e., $17\pm (z_{0.025})9.8198$ where $z_{0.025}$ is the 2.5th quantile of the standard normal distribution, i.e., -1.96, so, we have 17-(1.96)(9.8198) and 17+(1.96)(9.8198), i.e., -2.2468 and 36.2468. There is a probability of 95% that the true difference of means $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}$ is between -2.2468 and 36.2468. This confidence interval contains the number 0, this is consistent with the results we got in a. Because we fail to reject the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in Virginia is different from the average credit score for an adult in North Carolina at the significance level of 0.05.

Answer from: Quest

step-by-step explanation:

Surface area of the right triangular prism

Answer from: Quest

i can you with this question sweetie!

step-by-step explanation:

Another question on Mathematics

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00

Ifurniture stores having a weekend sale and is offering 20% discount on patio chairs and table the sales tax on furniture is 6.25 using function composition how can you represent the total amount a that you would need to pay for this furniture that cost x dollars

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00

Pat listed all the numbers that have 15 as a multiple write the numbers in pats list

Answers: 3

Answer

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30

Me complete this proof! prove that a quadrilateral is a square. me with the steps for this proof.

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00

Since opening night, attendance at play a has increased steadily, while attendance at play b first rose and then fell. equations modeling the daily attendance y at each play are shown below, where x is the number of days since opening night. on what day(s) was the attendance the same at both plays? what was the attendance? play a: y = 8x + 191 play b: y = -x^2 + 26x + 126 a. the attendance was never the same at both plays. b. the attendance was the same on day 5. the attendance was 231 at both plays on that day. c. the attendance was the same on day 13. the attendance was 295 at both plays on that day. d. the attendance was the same on days 5 and 13. the attendance at both plays on those days was 231 and 295 respectively.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Experian would like to test the hypothesis that the average credit score for an adult in virginia is...

Questions