Diagram a
diagram b
diagram c

on en on
part a: complete diagram a so that it is a function.
part b: is it possible to complete diagram b so that it is not a function. if so,
complete the diagram to show a relation, but not a function. if not, justify
your reasoning
part c: is it possible to complete the mapping diagram for diagram c so it
represents a function? if so, complete the diagram to show a function. if
not, justify your reasoning.

75

step-by-step explanation:

you do x-29=46 (the number of cantaloupes sold)

in order to find x, you have to find what minus 29 equals 46, meaning you'd have to add 29 to 46.

29+46=75

if you replace x with 75, the equation looks like:

75-29=46

x=75

0,0

step-by-step explanation:

55.44 inches

step-by-step explanation:

part a. assuming a perfectly linear relationship, we can find the slope from the first two data points.

slope = m = (change in rainfall)/(change in years)

= (61.80 -62.33)/(2005 -2004) = -0.53/1 = -0.53

then the point-slope form of the equation of the line can be written as

y = m(x -h) +k . . . . . m = -0.53, (h, k) = (0, 62.33)

y = -0.53x +62.33 . . . x = years after 2004

part b. in 2017, x = 2017 -2004 = 13. then the predicted rainfall is

y = -0.53·13 +62.33 = 55.44 . . inches

the predicted rainfall in 2017 is 55.44 in.

a

step-by-step explanation:

its wrong