Guilty verdicts in court cases a reporter on cnn. com stated in july 2010 that 95% of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict. to test the accuracy of this claim, we collect a random sample of 2000 court cases that went to trial and record the proportion that resulted in a guilty verdict. state the null and alternative hypotheses. your answer should be an expression composed of symbols: ミ夭< . > , μ, μ1-12-р, p1-p2, 0.95, rho, p, p1-p2

Step-by-step explanation:

Null hypothesis : Its a statement of equality that claims that there is no significant difference between the groups being tested.

Alternative hypothesis : Its a statement of inequality that claims that there is  significant difference between the groups being tested.

Given : A reporter on cnn.com stated in July 2010 that 95% of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict.

Let p be the parameter that denotes the population proportion of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict .

Then, the the null and alternative hypotheses for the given situation will be :

square root of 36/6 = 2.449489743

square root of 16/6 = 1.632993162

square root of 6 = 2.449489743

the answer is square root of 16/6 because the square root of 36/6 is the same answer as square root of 6 = 2.449489743