Jime
absalom states that 0 is a rational number. which is a correct explanation for this statement?
the number o is a whole number, which is part of the rational numbers.
the number o is the center of the number line.
the number 0 is a natural number, which is part of the rational numbers.
the number 0 cannot be written as a fraction.
o
mark this and return
save and exit
next
submit
what’s the answer

aloha~! my name is zalgo and i am here to you out on this amazing day. to answer your question, yes, nonzero numbers can have a greatest common factor and that would be 1. still don't get it? let me considering every number is divisible by 1 and hence every number has 1 as a factor of theirs. so, if 2 nonzero numbers didn't share any gcf (greatest common factor), they would still have a factor in common and that would be 1.

i hope that this ! : p

"stay and stay proud! " - zalgo

(by the way, do you mind marking me as brainliest? i'd greatly appreciate it! mahalo! x3)

replace   with   27   and simplify.

10 , 27 , 10 , 70 , 10 , 35 , 10 , 48

step-by-step explanation:

your answer is

a.

5

step-by-step explanation:

a.for lorena 14 hours makes $126   for 16 hours she makes 144

for julie 6 hours makes $72 for 21 hours its $252

b. julie makes more money than lorena julie makes $12 an hour and lorena makes $9  

.