Jeffrey calculated the slope between two pairs of points. he found that the slope between -5, 6 and -3, 2 is -2. he also found that the slope between (-1, -2) and (0, -4) is -2. jeffrey concluded that all of these points are on the same line. use the drop-down menus to complete the statements about jeffrey's conclusion. jeffrey is (correct/incorrect). all of these points (are/are not) on the same line because the slope between(-3,2) and( 0,-4), which are coordinates from each of the pairs above,(is/is not) equal to -2.

Jeffrey is correct

All of these points are on the same line because the slope between (-3,2) and( 0,-4), which are coordinates from each of the pairs above, is equal to -2

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that

The formula to calculate the slope between two points is equal to

step 1

Find the slope between -5, 6 and -3, 2

substitute the values in the formula

step 2

Find the slope between (-1, -2) and (0, -4)

substitute the values in the formula

step 3

Find the slope between (-3, 2) and (0, -4)

substitute the values in the formula

therefore

Jeffrey is correct

All of these points are on the same line because the slope between (-3,2) and( 0,-4), which are coordinates from each of the pairs above, is equal to -2

step-by-step explanation:

always plug in x. in this case, x equals 4.

i'm going to first solve 4(2+3x)

1) 4(2+3(4)) use pemdas to solve.

i'm going to multiply whats in the parenthesis first, so 3 times 4=12.

2)4 (2+12) i'm then going to multiply 4 by both numbers in the parenthesis (because multiplying comes before adding)

4 times 2= 8.   4 times 12= 48

4) (8+48)= 56 (answer)

i'm then going to solve 8+12x and plug in 4 for x.

1) 8 +12(4)

multiplying comes before adding, so i'm gonna multiply 12 and 4.

12 times 4= 48.

2) 8+48=56

both equal the same!

according to this law, when unemployment goes up by 1%, gdp drops by 2%. in the question, unemployment rate goes from 2% to 5%, meaning unemployment goes up by 3%, so the gdp drops by 6%. thus the effect is a drop in gdp by 6%.

step-by-step explanation: