write down the negation of each statement
1. ∃y ∈z such that ∀x ∈z, r (x + y)
2. ∀x ∈z, ∃y∈z such that r(x + y)

1. ∀ y ∈ Z such that ∃ x ∈ Z, ¬R (x + y)

2. ∃ x ∈ Z, ∀ y ∈ Z such that ¬R(x + y)

Step-by-step explanation:

If we negate a quantified statement, first we negate all the quantifiers in the statement from left to right, ( keeping the same order ) then we negative the statement,

Here, the given statement,

1. ∃y ∈Z such that ∀x ∈Z, R (x + y)

By the above definition,

Negation of this statement is ∀ y ∈ Z such that ∃ x ∈ Z, ¬R (x + y),

2. Similarly,

The negation of statement ∀x ∈Z, ∃y∈Z such that R(x + y),

∃ x ∈ Z, ∀ y ∈ Z such that ¬R(x + y)

wth is with the little mtn top and what are you talking about like fix your words and accually make sence with them and i like was in a completly different question like three times like it seems like your ilitteret

when the daily mileage is greater than 40 miles, unlimited mileage plan will save you money. 40 miles is the break-even point.

step-by-step explanation: