Evaluate 1 3 m − 1 − 1 2 n 3 1 m−1− 2 1 nstart fraction, 1, divided by, 3, end fraction, m, minus, 1, minus, start fraction, 1, divided by, 2, end fraction, n when m = 2 1 m=21m, equals, 21 and n = 1 2 n=12n, equals, 12.

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.