subject
Mathematics, 04.09.2019 04:10 shaeby13

Idon’t have a calculator and i cant do it in my head✊


Idon’t have a calculator and i cant do it in my head✊

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:40
Which recursive formula can be used to determine the total amount of money earned in any year based on the amount earned in the previous year? f(n+1)=f(n)+5
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
The larger of two number is 4 less than twice the smaller number. the sum is 41. find the numbers
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
For this option, you will work individually. the pythagorean theorem can be used in many real-world scenarios. part 1 write your own real-world scenario where the pythagorean theorem can be applied to find a missing piece. you may choose to write a problem that is two- or three-dimensional in nature. be sure that you will be able to draw a diagram of your scenario. write out your problem and submit it for part 1. be sure to end your scenario with a question. part 2 draw a diagram of the scenario you created in part 1. you may draw by hand and scan and upload your drawing or create a computer-generated drawing for submission. be sure to label all parts and dimensions of the drawing. part 3 solve the question that you posed in part 1. show all of your steps in answering the question. for this option, you will need to submit all three parts for full credit—your real-world problem and question, the diagram that you created, and your work solving the problem, showing all steps. * note that your instructor is looking for your own original idea. while it is acceptable to use the internet for research and inspiration, academic integrity policies apply.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Idon’t have a calculator and i cant do it in my head✊
...
Questions