According to the february 2008 federal trade commission report on consumer fraud and identity theft, 23% of all complaints in 2007 were for identity theft. in that year, alaska had 321 complaints of identity theft out of 1,432 consumer complaints ("consumer fraud and," 2008). does this data provide enough evidence to show that alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%? test at the 5% level.

Step-by-step explanation:

If p is the sample proportion of thefts and frauds for identify then population proportion is 23%

P = 0.23

Sample proportion p = 0.224

p diff = -0.076

Test statistic Z = p diff/se = -0.339

p value = 0.738

SInce p >alpha of 5% we accept H0

There is no statistical evidence to prove that this data provide enough evidence to show that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%

wholesale price is the initial price before markup. retail price comes after the markup.

a price of 8 bucks that's marked up by 100%   is

formula: initial price + (percent markup in fraction/decimal)(initial price)

8+(1)(8)

8+8

16

retail price is $16.

you might have to contact customer support. if you have it on your iphone you just got into your settings> subscriptions> cancel

step-by-step explanation: