In a survey, 39% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. a veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 200 pet owners and discovered that 73 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? use the alphaequals0.05 level of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hypotheses:

(Left tailed test)

p = sample proportion

n = sample size = 200

Sample proportion = p = 73/200 = 0.365

Std error = 0.03404

p difference = 0.365-0.39 = 0.025

t = 0.025/se = 0.7344

df = 199

p value = 0.2317

Since p >0.05 accept null hypothesis

No,the veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical because there is no statistical evidence to support his claim.

two data sets with the same median will not have the same varaibility

step-by-step explanation:

the answer is a if my teacher taught me correct