subject
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 17:10 Trackg8101

Let a, b e r. we learned that if f is continuous on (a, b) then f is integrable on [a, b]. we did not look at the proof of this, which is quite involved, in class. you will prove a weaker version of this theorem in this question. first we need a definition: definition: let c > 0. given f : [a, b] → r. we say f is c-pink iff "x € [a, b], vy € [a, b], \f (x) – f(y) 0. fix a c-pink function f : [a, b] → r. prove that f is integrable on (a, b). hint: let n e n. let pn be the partition dividing [a, b] into n equal sub-intervals. using the fact that f is c-pink, what simple expression can you conclude u(f, pn) - l(f, pn) is less than? conclude with the e-reformulation of integrability.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30
One number is 4 less than 3 times a second number. if 3 more than two times the first number is decreased by 2 times the second number, the result is 11. use the substitution method. what is the first number?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:30
What is the name of a polygon that has four congruent sides and theses angle measures 60,120,60,120?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
Stefanie is painting her bedroom. she can paint 2 1/3 square feet in 4/5 of an hour. how many square feet can she paint in one hour?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
The measures of two supplementary angles are (2x + 10)° and (8x + 10)°. what is the measure of the larger angle? a. 16° b. 44° c. 14° d. 138°
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Let a, b e r. we learned that if f is continuous on (a, b) then f is integrable on [a, b]. we did no...
Questions