Determine whether each statement is true or false. provide a justification for each answer (a showing that a statement holds for a few cases is sufficient to prove a universal statement. (b providing one example when the statement holds is sufficient to prove an existential statement. providing one counterexample is sufficient to disprove a universal statement. proof by exhaustion can be used to prove a universally quantified statement with a finite domain. feedback?

the central idea is that:

individuals should refuse to cooperate with institutions they believe unjust.

thoreau felt  that governments were more often agents of corruption than justice, even democracies, and that just because the majority feels a certain way does not make it just or correct in absolute terms. he uses the fact that slavery exists in our democracy to support this idea.

he goes on to say that, as a result, people should live true to their own internal laws regarding right and wrong, as a product of reflection and a moral life, rather than following every law that society imposes. 

step-by-step explanation:

i can't see the picture : /