Lily manipulated the function representing account b in order to compare the rates of accounts a and b. her work is
shown here:
b(t) = 3,000(1.008)120
= 3,000(1.008)4•
= 3,000(1.008)4.4
= 3,000(1.0084,4
- 3,000(1.0324)*
which statement is true?
lily should have multiplied 1.008 by 4 instead of raising 1.008 to the power of 4.
lily didn't make any mistakes.
lily should have divided 12 by 4 instead of 3.
lily should have raised 1.008 to the power of 3 instead of 4.
what statement is true

idek

step-by-step explanation:

answer: idk wbu

step-by-step explanation:

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.