Merrida wote the table of points below 16 which explains whether or not metrida has described a proportional relationship, and why? merida has described a proportional relationship. it is linear and the line passes through the origin merida has described a proportional relationship. it is linear and does not pass through the origin mennda has not described a proportional relationship although it passes through the origin, it is not a linear relationship merrida has not described a proportional relationship. it is not finear and does not pass through the origin

she drove 134 miles

step-by-step explanation:

the ratio of balloons to tables is 5: 2 and the constant variation is 5.

the equation is y=5x

85.560%

step-by-step explanation:

conditional probability is defined as:

p(a|b) = p(a∩b) / p(b)

in other words, the probability that a occurs, given that b has occurred = the probability that both a and b occur / the probability that b occurs.

in this example:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = p(turns 64 & turns 44) / p(turns 44).

if someone turns 64, they must have already turned 44, so:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = p(turns 64) / p(turns 44)

on page 42, we see that of the original 100,000, 94944 turn 44, and 81234 turn 64.   therefore:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = 81234 / 94944

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = 0.85560

i believe its the last graph