The population of elk on the bridger range in the rocky mountains of western montana can be modeled by the equation pn+1 = pn + 2.5pn(1 - pn ). the population in 1984 was 10% of the maximum population sustainable. what percent of the maximum sustainable population should be present in 1994? a. 54% c. 67% b. 46% d. 62%

answer: 2 and 1

step-by-step explanation: got this question

if im not mistaking its

step-by-step explanation:  

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

to find the perimeter, you add up all the lengths of the sides. in this case you would have to add up 18+22+40+80 which equals 160.