subject
Mathematics, 29.06.2019 16:50 kittenface3428

Each year a nationally recognized publication conducts its 'survey of america's best graduate and professional schools.' an academic advisor wants to predict the typical starting salary of a graduate at a top business school using gmat score of the school as a predictor variable. total gmat scores range from 200 to 800. a simple linear regression of salary versus gmat using 25 data points yields the regression equation given below. y = 228x - 92,040 give an interpretation of the y-intercept. the value has no practical interpretation since a gmat of 0 is nonsensical and outside the range of the sample data. we estimate the base salary of graduates of a top business school to be $-92,040. we estimate salary to decrease $92,040 for every 1-point increase in gmat. we expect to predict salary to within 2(92040) = $184,080 of its true value using gmat in a straight-line model.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00
The graph shows the function f(x) = (2.5)x was horizontally translated left by a value of h to get the function g(x) = (2.5)x–h.
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Asailor is looking at a kite. if he is looking at the kite at an angle of elevation of 36and the distance from the boat to the point where the kite is directly overhead is 40 feet, how high is the kite?
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
F(x)=x^3+4 question 6 options: the parent function is shifted up 4 units the parent function is shifted down 4 units the parent function is shifted left 4 units the parent function is shifted right 4 units
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:40
Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Each year a nationally recognized publication conducts its 'survey of america's best graduate and pr...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 24.09.2020 05:01
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 24.09.2020 05:01
question
Biology, 24.09.2020 06:01