Hugger polls contends that an agent conducts a mean of 53 in-depth home surveys every week. a streamlined survey form has been introduced, and hugger wants to evaluate its effectiveness. the number of in-depth surveys conducted during a week by a random sample of 15 agents are: 53 57 50 55 58 54 60 52 59 62 60 60 51 59 56 picture click here for the excel data file at the .05 level of significance, can we conclude that the mean number of interviews conducted by the agents is more than 53 per week? (round your answer to 3 decimal places.) reject h0 : μ ≤ 53 when the test statistic is . compute the value of the test statistic. (round your answer to 3 decimal places.) value of the test statistic what is your decision regarding h0? reject do not reject estimate the p-value. the p-value is .

60°

step-by-step explanation:

the measure angle of c in an isosceles triangle abc is 60° because in isosceles triangle,the measures of all the angles is 60°.

246

step-by-step explanation:

answer: 30

step-by-step explanation: its 30 because im a basketball player and stephen curry hits most of his shots so if you put 30 you might make the shot goodluck

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.