Julie tried to use the law of syllogism to draw a conclusion based on the statements below. explain why she is not able to do so. if ab is bisected by another line segment, two pairs of congruent angles are formed. if ab is bisected by another line segment, segment ab will be cut into two equal sections.

 The conditional statements are not in the correct form to make a conclusion using the law of syllogism. “If p, then q and if p, then r” cannot be used to draw a conclusion using the law of syllogism. The law of syllogism could be used if the hypothesis in the second statement was "if two pairs of congruent angles are formed."

Step-by-step explanation:

"If p, then q and if p, then r" cannot be used to draw a conclusion using the law of syllogism.

Neither of the conclusions of the conditional statements are the hypothesis of the other.

"If two pairs of congruent angles are formed" could be the hypothesis of the second statement.

** Both can be used to answer the question :)

typically if you want , you would actually put questions here for us to you. but hey, that's just me. maybe someone will magically answer the questions for you without knowing what they are.

don't report but were is the digram

step-by-step explanation: