Which best explains whether or not triangles rst and acb are congruent? the figures are congruent. δrst can be mapped to δacb by a reflection over the x-axis and a translation 2 units to the left. the figures are congruent. δrst can be mapped to δacb by a reflection over the y-axis and a translation 2 units down. the figures are not congruent. point r corresponds to point a, but s corresponds to b and t corresponds to c. the figures are not congruent. point r does not correspond with point a.

A

Well, the triangles are congruent. So we can eliminate C & D.

B is incorrect. This is because if you map triangle RST across the y-axis, it won't even be close to ABC. Even if you did move the triangle down 2 units, to wouldn't perfectly fit onto ABC.

A is correct because if you reflect it across the x-axis, RST will make the same shape as ABC. Moving it left by 2 spaces will make RST perfectly fit onto ABC.

i'm pretty sure it's 477,585,296, but perhaps my math is incorrect.

stethere all not eveanp-by-step explanation: